When speaking from lived experience in relation to the sexual abuse connected to Harrods, my focus is on:

the impact of institutional abuse on identity, safety, and long-term psychological wellbeing

how power, status, and organisational systems can enable harm and silence survivors

the experience of disclosure, disbelief, and delayed recognition

the long-term effects of trauma, including shame, dissociation, anxiety, and hypervigilance

recovery, meaning-making, and rebuilding a sense of self after abuse

survivor agency, voice, and choice in how stories are told

ethical, trauma-informed approaches to media reporting and public discussion

advocating for accountability, learning, and systemic change rather than sensationalism

I do not share graphic detail, speculate on legal matters, or speak beyond my own lived experience and professional scope. Any engagement in this area prioritises dignity, respect, and the emotional safety of survivors.

Boundaries and Ethics

I am intentional about when and how I speak publicly about lived experience. I will always prioritise survivor safety, informed consent, and ethical boundaries, and I reserve the right to decline media requests that do not align with these principles.

My role as a therapist means I am particularly mindful of the distinction between advocacy, commentary, and clinical work. My therapeutic services are not a space for public storytelling, and this separation is maintained clearly and consistently.